G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅8.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 90W.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 160W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅8.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 160W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 90W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon PRO W6600M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 8.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data, 23.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 2 Super Resolution. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 6 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 2060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $349 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 8.0% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 23.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer 2021 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (90W vs 160W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W6600M make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (90W vs 160W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 2060. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 2060 currently gives you 23.7% higher G3D Mark and 8.0% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	108 FPS	140 FPS
medium	98 FPS	118 FPS
high	82 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	112 FPS
medium	83 FPS	92 FPS
high	69 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	50 FPS
medium	43 FPS	43 FPS
high	31 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	290 FPS	243 FPS
medium	247 FPS	206 FPS
high	197 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	134 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	170 FPS
medium	164 FPS	142 FPS
high	131 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	93 FPS
medium	91 FPS	78 FPS
high	75 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	635 FPS	513 FPS
medium	508 FPS	411 FPS
high	423 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	257 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	385 FPS
medium	381 FPS	308 FPS
high	318 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	257 FPS
medium	254 FPS	205 FPS
high	212 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	128 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	428 FPS	262 FPS
medium	354 FPS	231 FPS
high	286 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	199 FPS
medium	302 FPS	176 FPS
high	235 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	117 FPS
medium	166 FPS	99 FPS
high	154 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	60 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 11,407 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 23.7%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	14,114+24%	11,407
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1920+7%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock	1680 MHz	2034 MHz+21%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	120+7%	112
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+280%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	30+7%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600M has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+50%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 56% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	160W	90W-44%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	113mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	72-10%	80°C
Perf/Watt	88.2	126.7+44%