G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 473.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 160W instead of 295W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅102.6% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
1045.8% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌84.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 160W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 473.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 160W instead of 295W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅102.6% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
1045.8% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌84.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 160W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7900 better than GeForce RTX 2060?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W7900 averages 102.6% more FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 28,211 vs 14,114 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO W7900 is a 2023 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7900 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 99.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 48 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020). That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W7900 is about 1045.8% more expensive on MSRP at $3,999 MSRP versus $349 MSRP, and you are getting 102.6% more estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data and 99.9% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 2060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7900 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 2060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $349 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon PRO W7900 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	108 FPS	262 FPS
medium	98 FPS	242 FPS
high	82 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	246 FPS
medium	83 FPS	205 FPS
high	69 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	174 FPS
medium	43 FPS	145 FPS
high	31 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	290 FPS	813 FPS
medium	247 FPS	639 FPS
high	197 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	617 FPS
medium	164 FPS	495 FPS
high	131 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	320 FPS
medium	91 FPS	256 FPS
high	75 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	635 FPS	945 FPS
medium	508 FPS	775 FPS
high	423 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	714 FPS
medium	381 FPS	587 FPS
high	318 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	498 FPS
medium	254 FPS	412 FPS
high	212 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	428 FPS	946 FPS
medium	354 FPS	801 FPS
high	286 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	714 FPS
medium	302 FPS	604 FPS
high	235 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	505 FPS
medium	166 FPS	437 FPS
high	154 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 99.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	14,114	28,211+100%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1920	6144+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+851%
Boost Clock	1680 MHz	2495 MHz+49%
ROPs	48	192+300%
TMUs	120	384+220%
L1 Cache	1.9 MB	3 MB+58%
L2 Cache	3 MB	6 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	30	96+220%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 157.1% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	48 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s	864 GB/s+157%
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	3 MB	6 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 59.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	160W-46%	295W
Recommended PSU	500W-33%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	113mm	111mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	72-10%	80°C
Perf/Watt	88.2	95.6+8%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 91.3% less ($3650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 469% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).