
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 973.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 400W, a 240W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 280mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅33.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌902.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 400W vs 160W.
- ❌22.3% longer card at 280mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 973.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 400W, a 240W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 280mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅33.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌902.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 400W vs 160W.
- ❌22.3% longer card at 280mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 13,182 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 7.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+7% | 13,182 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3840 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+134% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1967 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 240 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+153% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 60 ×2+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 157.1% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 864 GB/s+157% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-60% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 280mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+167% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 90% less ($3150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 963.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-90% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+963% | 3.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #168 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













