G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅394.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 264.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅394.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 264.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro WX 3200?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 2060 averages 394.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,114 vs 2,209 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 538.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 2060 is about 75.4% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 394.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 538.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 3200 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro WX 3200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 2,209 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	108 FPS	41 FPS
medium	98 FPS	27 FPS
high	82 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	29 FPS
medium	83 FPS	17 FPS
high	69 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	10 FPS
medium	43 FPS	7 FPS
high	31 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	290 FPS	78 FPS
medium	247 FPS	49 FPS
high	197 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	24 FPS
medium	164 FPS	17 FPS
high	131 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	7 FPS
medium	91 FPS	5 FPS
high	75 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	635 FPS	99 FPS
medium	508 FPS	80 FPS
high	423 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	75 FPS
medium	381 FPS	60 FPS
high	318 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	50 FPS
medium	254 FPS	40 FPS
high	212 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	428 FPS	99 FPS
medium	354 FPS	80 FPS
high	286 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	75 FPS
medium	302 FPS	60 FPS
high	235 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	50 FPS
medium	166 FPS	40 FPS
high	154 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro WX 3200

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 2,209 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 538.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	14,114+539%	2,209
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1920+200%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+366%	1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	120+275%	32
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+1088%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 84.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 82°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	160W	65W-59%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	113mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	72-12%	82°C
Perf/Watt	88.2+159%	34.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 costs 43% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 264% better value.