
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+434.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 359.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,642 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅+434.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 359.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,642 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro WX 4150?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 4150 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro WX 4150

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 2,642 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 434.2%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+434% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+114% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+242% | 1.887 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+60% | 1053 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+114% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+764% | 0.22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+67% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 14% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 359.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $300-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+359% | 8.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | Baffin |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #168 | #620 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













