GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon Pro WX 5100
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅64.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 266.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
2016Why buy it
- ✅31.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌43% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 156.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1086 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+157% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+7% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+66% | 3.892 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+55% | 1086 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+7% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+332% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 31.8% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 7.906 GB+32% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 173mm |
| Height | 113mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-12% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+20% | 73.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 30.1% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 267.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-30% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+267% | 11.0 |
| Codename | TU106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | January 7 2019 | November 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #416 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro WX 5100
