GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon R5 435
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R5 435 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R5 435 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Civilization VI
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R5 435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅1428.8% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 324.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Radeon R5 435
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $269 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R5 435 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon R5 435
The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R5 435's 762 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 1752.2%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R5 435 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 320 (Radeon R5 435). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R5 435 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+1752% | 762 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+500% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+879% | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+63% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 120+500% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+2275% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+2208% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 435 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R5 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 435 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 435. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 435) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R5 435 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+2208% | 0.13 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 435). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R5 435 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 435). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 435).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R5 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R5 435's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon R5 435 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon R5 435). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R5 435 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 113mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+247% | 25.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Radeon R5 435 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R5 435 was 77.1% cheaper ($269 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 9.5 (Radeon R5 435) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 325.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R5 435 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $80-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+325% | 9.5 |
| Codename | TU106 | Jet |
| Release | January 7 2019 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #922 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R5 435
