
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M465X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+689.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 239.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Radeon R7 M465X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,787 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon R7 M465X
2016Why buy it
- ✅+689.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 239.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,787 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R7 M465X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R7 M465X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 20 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R7 M465X

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R7 M465X
Radeon R7 M465X
The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 1,787 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 689.8%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+690% | 1,787 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+275% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+581% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+82% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+275% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+1362% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 M465X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465X has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M465X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 M465X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE (Early) (Radeon R7 M465X). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M465X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE (Early) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M465X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+271% | 23.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 M465X launched at $150. The Radeon R7 M465X costs 57% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.9 (Radeon R7 M465X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 239.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $150-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+239% | 11.9 |
| Codename | TU106 | Tropo |
| Release | January 7 2019 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #715 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













