GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅576.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 748% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 806 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 1651.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 64 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) with 240 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+1651% | 806 |
| Architecture | Turing | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 4096+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+642% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2920 MHz+74% |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 120 | 256+113% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 64+113% |
| Tensor Cores | 240+88% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 6.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-47% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+3167% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 was 51.6% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 741.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $169-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+742% | 4.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 48 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #168 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
