
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅102.9% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 104% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅102.9% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 104% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R9 280?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 280 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 280

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 280
Radeon R9 280
The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 280's 5,532 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 155.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 933 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+155% | 5,532 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+7% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+93% | 3.344 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+80% | 933 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+7% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+332% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 280 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 has 3 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+100% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+40% | 240 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-20% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+218% | 27.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon R9 280 costs 20.1% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 104% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $279-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+104% | 19.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | Tahiti |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #168 | #415 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













