GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R9 350

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 350

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

  • +606.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $250 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,998 vs 14,114).
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R9 350?
Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 14,114 vs 1,998 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 350 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, 606.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 2060 is about 252.5% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 606.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 350 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 350 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 350 is 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 1,998 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
1080p
low108 FPS90 FPS
medium98 FPS72 FPS
high82 FPS60 FPS
ultra69 FPS39 FPS
1440p
low95 FPS67 FPS
medium83 FPS54 FPS
high69 FPS45 FPS
ultra60 FPS29 FPS
4K
low47 FPS27 FPS
medium43 FPS26 FPS
high31 FPS17 FPS
ultra27 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
1080p
low290 FPS90 FPS
medium247 FPS72 FPS
high197 FPS60 FPS
ultra155 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low192 FPS67 FPS
medium164 FPS54 FPS
high131 FPS45 FPS
ultra104 FPS34 FPS
4K
low108 FPS45 FPS
medium91 FPS36 FPS
high75 FPS30 FPS
ultra57 FPS22 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
1080p
low635 FPS90 FPS
medium508 FPS72 FPS
high423 FPS60 FPS
ultra318 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low476 FPS67 FPS
medium381 FPS54 FPS
high318 FPS45 FPS
ultra238 FPS34 FPS
4K
low318 FPS45 FPS
medium254 FPS36 FPS
high212 FPS30 FPS
ultra159 FPS22 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
1080p
low428 FPS90 FPS
medium354 FPS72 FPS
high286 FPS60 FPS
ultra244 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low357 FPS67 FPS
medium302 FPS54 FPS
high235 FPS45 FPS
ultra193 FPS34 FPS
4K
low204 FPS45 FPS
medium166 FPS36 FPS
high154 FPS30 FPS
ultra119 FPS22 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 350

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 350's 1,998 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 606.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
G3D Mark Score
14,114+606%
1,998
Architecture
Turing
GCN 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1920
2560+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.451 TFLOPS+26%
5.12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1680 MHz+68%
1000 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
120
160+33%
L1 Cache
1.9 MB+202%
0.63 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+200%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 350 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+200%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12_0
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
Encoder
NVENC (Turing)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Turing)
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
TDP
160W-47%
300W
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
8-pin
None
Length
229mm
168mm
Height
113mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
72
Perf/Watt
88.2+1216%
6.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. The Radeon R9 350 costs 71.6% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Radeon R9 350
MSRP
$349
$99-72%
Performance per Dollar
40.4+100%
20.2
Codename
TU106
Grenada
Release
January 7 2019
June 18 2015
Ranking
#168
#296