G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅+198.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 27.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌45.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 110W.

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 160W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 221mm instead of 229mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,722 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅+198.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 27.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 160W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 221mm instead of 229mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌45.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 110W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,722 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R9 370?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 14,114 vs 4,722 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 370 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, 198.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 2060 is about 134.2% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 198.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 370 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 370 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 370 is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 4,722 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 370 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	108 FPS	100 FPS
medium	98 FPS	85 FPS
high	82 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	87 FPS
medium	83 FPS	75 FPS
high	69 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	27 FPS
medium	43 FPS	26 FPS
high	31 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 370

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	290 FPS	118 FPS
medium	247 FPS	87 FPS
high	197 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	41 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	67 FPS
medium	164 FPS	45 FPS
high	131 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	22 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	24 FPS
medium	91 FPS	16 FPS
high	75 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	9 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 370

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	635 FPS	212 FPS
medium	508 FPS	170 FPS
high	423 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	159 FPS
medium	381 FPS	127 FPS
high	318 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	106 FPS
medium	254 FPS	85 FPS
high	212 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 370

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	428 FPS	136 FPS
medium	354 FPS	109 FPS
high	286 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	99 FPS
medium	302 FPS	82 FPS
high	235 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	59 FPS
medium	166 FPS	45 FPS
high	154 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 370

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 370

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 370's 4,722 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 198.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score	14,114+199%	4,722
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1920+50%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+158%	2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1680 MHz+72%	975 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	120+50%	80
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+400%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 370 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 179 GB/s (Radeon R9 370) — a 87.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+88%	179 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 37% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 370
TDP	160W	110W-31%
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	221mm
Height	113mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	72-4%	75
Perf/Watt	88.2+106%	42.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. The Radeon R9 370 costs 57.3% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 27.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).