
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+135.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 34.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅+135.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 34.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R9 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 380

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 380's 6,000 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 135.2%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+135% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+7% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+86% | 3.476 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+73% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+7% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+332% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) — a 84.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+84% | 182.4 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 31.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-27% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+223% | 27.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 380 costs 43% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 33.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $199-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+34% | 30.2 |
| Codename | TU106 | Antigua |
| Release | January 7 2019 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #168 | #396 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













