GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon R9 M275
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R9 M275 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R9 M275 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R9 M275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅851.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 988.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M275
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R9 M275 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon R9 M275
The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 M275's 1,115 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 1165.8%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+1166% | 1,115 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+200% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+445% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+82% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+200% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+1088% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M275 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon R9 M275) — a 425% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M275) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+425% | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R9 M275). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (FL11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs UVD3 (Radeon R9 M275). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash (Radeon R9 M275).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | UVD3 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M275 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+492% | 14.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M275 was 14% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 991.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $300-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+992% | 3.7 |
| Codename | TU106 | Venus |
| Release | January 7 2019 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #168 | #851 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 M275
