
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+338.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,218 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌14.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅+338.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,218 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌14.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R9 M290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 M290X

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 3,218 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 338.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+339% | 3,218 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+50% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+180% | 2.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+87% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+50% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+513% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+174% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 12.8% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8.0 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 405% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-13% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+405% | 8.0 |
| Codename | TU106 | Neptune |
| Release | January 7 2019 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #168 | #566 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













