G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅436.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 340.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

✅436.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 340.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R9 M380?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 2060 averages 436.5% more FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,114 vs 2,752 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 M380 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, 412.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 2060 is about 16.3% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 436.5% more estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data and 412.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M380 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 M380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M380 is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 2,752 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M380 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
1080p
low	108 FPS	39 FPS
medium	98 FPS	25 FPS
high	82 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	27 FPS
medium	83 FPS	17 FPS
high	69 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	10 FPS
medium	43 FPS	6 FPS
high	31 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 M380

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
1080p
low	290 FPS	54 FPS
medium	247 FPS	28 FPS
high	197 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	26 FPS
medium	164 FPS	15 FPS
high	131 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	7 FPS
medium	91 FPS	5 FPS
high	75 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 M380

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
1080p
low	635 FPS	124 FPS
medium	508 FPS	99 FPS
high	423 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	93 FPS
medium	381 FPS	74 FPS
high	318 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	62 FPS
medium	254 FPS	50 FPS
high	212 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 M380

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
1080p
low	428 FPS	110 FPS
medium	354 FPS	86 FPS
high	286 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	61 FPS
medium	302 FPS	48 FPS
high	235 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	35 FPS
medium	166 FPS	25 FPS
high	154 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 M380

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 M380

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 M380's 2,752 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 412.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score	14,114+413%	2,752
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1920+150%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+320%	1.536 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1680 MHz+68%	1000 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	120+150%	48
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+900%	0.19 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M380) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+250%	96 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M380
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	113mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	72-15%	85
Perf/Watt	88.2+140%	36.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M380 costs 14% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 339.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).