G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅+607.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 508.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,994 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅+607.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 508.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,994 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon R9 M385X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 14,114 vs 1,994 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 M385X is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, 607.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 2060 is about 16.3% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 607.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M385X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 M385X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M385X is 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 1,994 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M385X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	108 FPS	36 FPS
medium	98 FPS	22 FPS
high	82 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	24 FPS
medium	83 FPS	14 FPS
high	69 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	9 FPS
medium	43 FPS	6 FPS
high	31 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 M385X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	290 FPS	53 FPS
medium	247 FPS	29 FPS
high	197 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	26 FPS
medium	164 FPS	15 FPS
high	131 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	7 FPS
medium	91 FPS	4 FPS
high	75 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 M385X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	635 FPS	90 FPS
medium	508 FPS	72 FPS
high	423 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	67 FPS
medium	381 FPS	54 FPS
high	318 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	45 FPS
medium	254 FPS	36 FPS
high	212 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 M385X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	428 FPS	63 FPS
medium	354 FPS	52 FPS
high	286 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	37 FPS
medium	302 FPS	31 FPS
high	235 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	25 FPS
medium	166 FPS	20 FPS
high	154 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon R9 M385X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon R9 M385X

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 M385X

The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 1,994 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 607.8%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
G3D Mark Score	14,114+608%	1,994
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1920+114%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+227%	1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1680 MHz+53%	1100 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	120+114%	56
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+764%	0.22 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M385X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M385X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M385X). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M385X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon R9 M385X
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	113mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	72-15%	85
Perf/Watt	88.2+232%	26.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M385X costs 14% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 512.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).