
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 470/570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅46.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌95% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅46.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌95% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon RX 470/570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 470/570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 89 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 470/570

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 470/570
Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 7,935 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 77.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+78% | 7,935 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2048+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+31% | 4.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+39% | 1206 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120 | 128+7% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+280% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 470/570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 470/570 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470/570) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 120W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+33% | 66.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 470/570 costs 48.7% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 offers 9.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $179-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 44.3+10% |
| Codename | TU106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #315 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













