
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+101.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 85W.
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 160W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,000 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅+101.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 160W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 85W.
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,000 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon RX 470 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 470 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon RX 470 (móvel)'s 7,000 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 101.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1074 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+102% | 7,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2048+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+47% | 4.399 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+56% | 1074 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120 | 128+7% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+280% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 470 (móvel)'s 85W — a 61.2% difference. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 85W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+7% | 82.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) launched at $179. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) costs 48.7% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 39.1 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 3.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $179-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+3% | 39.1 |
| Codename | TU106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #360 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













