
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅172.8% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌252.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅172.8% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌252.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon RX 560 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 560 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 51 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 4,500 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 213.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+214% | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+88% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+162% | 2.462 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+32% | 1275 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+88% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+660% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 84.4% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 65W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+27% | 69.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 71.6% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 45.5 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 12.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $99-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 45.5+13% |
| Codename | TU106 | Baffin |
| Release | January 7 2019 | January 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #168 | #478 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













