
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6900 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅71.9% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌186.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon RX 6900 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅71.9% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6900 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌186.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6900 XT better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 767 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 6900 XT

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 26,729 — the Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 89.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6900 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 26,729+89% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 5120+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS+257% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2250 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 120 | 320+167% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+90% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 80+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — a 52.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the Radeon RX 6900 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 512 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2.5 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-47% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-41% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-20% | 2.5 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 89.1+1% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 65.1% less ($650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 26.8 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50.7% better value. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-65% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+51% | 26.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #35 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













