
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+84.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 163.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,658 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌43% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅+84.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 163.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,658 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌43% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon RX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 780 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 86 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 86 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 780

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 780
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon RX 780's 7,658 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 84.3%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2335 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 60 (Radeon RX 780) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+84% | 7,658 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3840+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+456% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2335 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 240+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+153% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 60+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 780 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 780 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-11% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+108% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 30.1% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 164.1% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-30% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+164% | 15.3 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #168 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













