GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon X1600 Pro
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon X1600 Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅5887.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 5986.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Radeon X1600 Pro
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon X1600 Pro
The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 99 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 14156.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+14157% | 99 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2048+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+8% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 128+7% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1600 Pro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 Pro carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+33% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+119% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs None (Radeon X1600 Pro). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon X1600 Pro).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Radeon X1600 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+12500% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon X1600 Pro was 57.3% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.7 (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 5671.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 Pro (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $149-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+5671% | 0.7 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon X1600 Pro
