
GeForce RTX 2060

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,450 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 866.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅105.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅136.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 240).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1848.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 101.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 240 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 28,454+102% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 18176+847% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+1312% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2505 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 120 | 568+373% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 17.8 MB+837% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 96 MB+3100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 142+373% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 568+137% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation carries 48 GB. RTX 6000 Ada Generation gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 185.7% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 384-bit on the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 960 GB/s+186% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 96 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-47% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 94.8+7% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 94.9% cheaper ($6450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 861.9% better value. The newer card here is RTX 6000 Ada Generation (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-95% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+862% | 4.2 |
| Codename | TU106 | AD102 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #168 | #24 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















