
GeForce RTX 2060

RTX A1000
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅30.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 180.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX A1000 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
- ❌40.5% longer card at 229mm vs 163mm.
RTX A1000
2024Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 163mm instead of 229mm, a 66mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌114.6% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A1000
The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX A1000's 10,814 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 30.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1462 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 18 (RTX A1000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+31% | 10,814 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2304+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 6.737 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+15% | 1462 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+67% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 2.3 MB+21% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+67% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+233% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 carries 8 GB. RTX A1000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 163mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 163mm |
| Height | 113mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 216.3+145% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 53.4% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 180.6% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-53% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+181% | 14.4 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA107 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #168 | #251 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















