
GeForce RTX 2060

RTX A2000
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅8.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX A2000 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌37.1% longer card at 229mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 229mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌28.9% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 26 (RTX A2000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+5% | 13,464 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3328+73% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+40% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+15% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 3.3 MB+74% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+15% | 26 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+131% | 104 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 carries 8 GB. RTX A2000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 167mm |
| Height | 113mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 192.3+118% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 22.4% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 35.1% better value. The newer card here is RTX A2000 (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-22% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+35% | 29.9 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA106 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #168 | #186 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















