
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A2000 12GB

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 12GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A2000 12GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $380 for the RTX A2000 12GB, it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 225.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+225.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX A2000 12GB

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) with 240 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+3% | 13,721 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3328+73% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+40% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+15% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 3.3 MB+74% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+15% | 26 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+131% | 104 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A2000 12GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 12GB has 8 GB. The RTX A2000 12GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 167mm |
| Height | 113mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 196.0+122% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449 and now averages $380. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 68.4% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 36.1 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 225.8% better value. The RTX A2000 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-22% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-68% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 117.6+226% | 36.1 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA106 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #168 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















