
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $762 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 130.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A4000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅46.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌218.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $762 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 130.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅46.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A4000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌218.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000 better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX A4000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A4000
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX A4000's 19,463 — the RTX A4000 leads by 37.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 48 (RTX A4000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 19,463+38% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 6144+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+197% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+8% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 192+60% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 6 MB+216% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 48+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 240+25% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 448 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 140W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 139.0+58% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 68.6% less ($762 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 130.9% better value. The RTX A4000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-69% | $1111 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+131% | 17.5 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #168 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













