GeForce RTX 2060
RTX A4000H
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+19.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 242.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX A4000H is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅20.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,815 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌186.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX A4000H's 11,815 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 19.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 240 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+19% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 6144+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+197% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+8% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 192+60% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 6 MB+216% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 48+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 240+25% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H carries 8 GB. RTX A4000H gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 448 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 140W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+5% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 65.1% cheaper ($651 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 242.4% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4000H (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-65% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+242% | 11.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #168 | #226 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX A4000H
