
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+19.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 242.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A4000H is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,815 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌186.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+19.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 242.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A4000H is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,815 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌186.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than RTX A4000H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A4000H make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX A4000H

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX A4000H's 11,815 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 19.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 240 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+19% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 6144+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+197% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+8% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 192+60% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 6 MB+216% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 48+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 240+25% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H has 8 GB. The RTX A4000H offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 448 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 140W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+5% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 65.1% less ($651 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 242.4% better value. The RTX A4000H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-65% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+242% | 11.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #168 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













