
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,251 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 589.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 230W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A5500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅73.7% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌931.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,251 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 589.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 230W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅73.7% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A5500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌931.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A5500 better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX A5500

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX A5500's 21,108 — the RTX A5500 leads by 49.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 240 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 21,108+50% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 10240+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+429% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 320+167% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 10 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 80+167% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 320+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 128.6% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the RTX A5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 768 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 35.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-30% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 91.8+4% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 90.3% less ($3251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 584.7% better value. The RTX A5500 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-90% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+585% | 5.9 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA102 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #168 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













