
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 205.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅83.6% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅16.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌472.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 205.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅83.6% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅16.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌472.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 117 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 87.7%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 240 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 26,498+88% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 8960+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+471% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2055 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 280+133% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 8.8 MB+363% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 70+133% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 280+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 28.6% advantage for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 432 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 140W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 189.3+115% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 82.5% less ($1650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 203.8% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-83% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+204% | 13.3 |
| Codename | TU106 | GB203 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #168 | #48 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













