
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,050 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,114 vs 35,431).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅+151% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅36.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 240).
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌587.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,050 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+151% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅36.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 240).
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,114 vs 35,431).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌587.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 771 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 190 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 999 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 797 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 971 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 887 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 797 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 371 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 932 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 858 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 752 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 688 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 564 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 378 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 35,431 — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell leads by 151%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 82 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) with 240 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 35,431+151% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 10496+447% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 50.53 TFLOPS+683% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2407 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 120 | 328+173% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 10.3 MB+442% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 64 MB+2033% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 82+173% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 328+37% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 32 GB. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — a 204.8% advantage for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 64 MB (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 32 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+205% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 64 MB+2033% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-20% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 177.2+101% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell launched at $2399. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 85.5% less ($2050 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 14.8 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 173% better value. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-85% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+173% | 14.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | GB203 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #168 | #6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













