
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

T400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+291.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 101.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $169 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,609 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅+291.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 101.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $169 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,609 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than T400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does T400 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and T400

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
T400
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the T400's 3,609 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 291.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the T400 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+291% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+400% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+490% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+18% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+400% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+400% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the T400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (T400) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the T400's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 120.3+36% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the T400 launched at $180. The T400 costs 48.4% less ($169 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 20.1 (T400) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 101% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $180-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+101% | 20.1 |
| Codename | TU106 | TU117 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #168 | #532 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














