
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+271.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 69.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
- ❌46.8% longer card at 229mm vs 156mm.
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 229mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,803 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅+271.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 69.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 229mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
- ❌46.8% longer card at 229mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,803 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than T400 4GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does T400 4GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and T400 4GB

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
T400 4GB
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the T400 4GB's 3,803 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 271.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+271% | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+400% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+490% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+18% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+400% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+400% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T400 4GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 156mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 126.8+44% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. The T400 4GB costs 54.4% less ($190 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 69% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $159-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+69% | 23.9 |
| Codename | TU106 | TU117 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #168 | #518 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














