
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Tesla C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+352.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1842.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,121 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌329.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Tesla C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅+352.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1842.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,121 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌329.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Tesla C2070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla C2070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Tesla C2070

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Tesla C2070's 3,121 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 352.2%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+352% | 3,121 |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+329% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+528% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+114% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+116% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla C2070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 39.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-33% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 248mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+573% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 76.7% less ($1150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.1 (Tesla C2070) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1823.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-77% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1824% | 2.1 |
| Codename | TU106 | GF100 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #168 | #575 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













