
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+316.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 19.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,390 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+316.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 19.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,390 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 3,390 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 316.3%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+316% | 3,390 |
| Architecture | Turing | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+1900% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 113.0+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 71.3% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 19.2% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $100-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+19% | 33.9 |
| Codename | TU106 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #508 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














