
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- β +488.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Turing (2018β2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β471.4% higher power demand at 160W vs 28W.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 160W, a 132W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019β2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (2,400 vs 14,114).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020Why buy it
- β +488.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Turing (2018β2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 160W, a 132W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019β2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β471.4% higher power demand at 160W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (2,400 vs 14,114).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 27 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 2,400 β the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 488.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+488% | 2,400 |
| Architecture | Turing | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+3900% | 48 |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+16% | 1450 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W β a 140.4% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 28W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+3% | 85.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs costs 100+% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) β the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU106 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #712 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













