CPU
GPU
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank #77 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,674 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1035 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design scores 9,674 and the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile reaches 10,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Raw compute: 4.55 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.299 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1035 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) with 240 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,674 | 10,080+4% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2560+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.55 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1185 MHz+14% | 1035 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+50% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 2.5 MB+32% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+50% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+200% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 264 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) — a 37.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 264 GB/s+38% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design draws 65W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-13% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+11% | 134.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
