GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
Radeon R9 Fury
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 Fury Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 Fury FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 Fury: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅16.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 275W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌323.1% higher power demand at 275W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 Fury Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,674 points.
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design scores 9,674 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 4.55 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,674+2% | 9,521 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3584+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.55 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS+58% |
| Boost Clock | 1185 MHz+19% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 224+87% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+116% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 264 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury) — a 93.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 512 GB/s+94% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 4096-bit+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design draws 65W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 123.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-76% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 195mm |
| Height | — | 115mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+330% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $549 |
| Codename | TU106 | Fiji |
| Release | January 29 2020 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #268 | #274 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design and Radeon R9 Fury
