GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 37.5% more VRAM (11 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Turing / 12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+37.5%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,157 points.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile scores 18,157 and the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti reaches 18,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,157 | 18,606+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.066 TFLOPS | 11.34 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 1582 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 64 | 88+38% |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+92% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+45% | 2.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 11 GB. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers 37.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) — a 8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 352-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 11 GB+38% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 484 GB/s+8% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 352-bit+38% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+45% | 2.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-54% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 157.9+112% | 74.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $145 |
| Codename | TU104B | GP102 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | March 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #172 | #95 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
