GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce GTX 1080 Ti?
The battle between the high-end GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and the legendary GeForce GTX 1080 Ti reveals the massive jump between Pascal flagship muscle and uncompromised Ada Lovelace power. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly 150-180% more rendering speed, moving from a legacy 4K icon to a world-class monster that masters Path Tracing and DLSS 3 Frame Generation.
Technically, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins on absolute architectural scale with its 16GB VRAM buffer—surpassing the 11GB on the older card—along with specialized cores that provide significantly more visual depth in modern titles. While the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti remains a robust and beloved legend for existing rigs, it lacks the overall throughput and feature set needed for uncompromised modern graphics in 2026. Moving to a next-generation Ti SUPER engine is a life-changing improvement for most enthusiasts.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the undisputed winner in absolute rendering performance and future-proof technological support. it represents a world-class 4K gaming icon. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti remains the winner for users on legacy rigs who want a reliable and historic performance for high-end stationary tasks. however, for any user seeking the most immersion and raw speed, the 40-70 series discrete card is the superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 44.7% higher G3D Mark score and 9.1% more VRAM (12 GB vs 11 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+44.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-44.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $145 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 74% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 162.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+162.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($145) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti's 18,606 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 44.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+45% | 18,606 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+64% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+157% | 11.34 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+56% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 88+38% |
| TMUs | 184 | 224+22% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+346% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1209% | 2.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 11 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 9.1% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) — a 4.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 352-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+9% | 11 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+4% | 484 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 352-bit+83% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1209% | 2.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+81% | 74.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti launched at $699 and now averages $145. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti costs 73.6% less ($405 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 128.3 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers 162.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-14% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $145-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9 | 128.3+162% |
| Codename | AD104 | GP102 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #32 | #95 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
