
GeForce RTX 2080 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 69.1% higher G3D Mark score and 51.8% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2080.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-69.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+69.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 58% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 39.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+39.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080
The GeForce RTX 2080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,676 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2080 scores 18,676 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 69.1%. The GeForce RTX 2080 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 368 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,676 | 31,578+69% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 7680+161% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+298% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2610 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 7.5 MB+159% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
| Tensor Cores | 368+53% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 51.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 7.906 GB | 12 GB+52% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 504 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 28% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W-25% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-7% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 116mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.9 | 110.8+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce RTX 2080 costs 57.6% less ($340 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.7 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 2080 offers 39.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-13% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-58% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.7+40% | 53.5 |
| Codename | TU104 | AD104 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #94 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















