GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Radeon PRO W6600X
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W6600X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W6600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W6600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Radeon PRO W6600X is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W6600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 368 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,766 | 13,113+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+44% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.447 TFLOPS | 10.15 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 1095 MHz | 2479 MHz+126% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+480% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+44% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6600X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600X. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s+71% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-33% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 159.6+46% | 109.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6600X (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Codename | TU104B | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #174 | #197 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO W6600X
