CPU
GPU
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 368 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,766 | 13,182+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 3840 ×2+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.447 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+134% |
| Boost Clock | 1095 MHz | 1967 MHz+80% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240 ×2+30% |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+287% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60 ×2+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 864 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-80% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 280mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 159.6+384% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $3499 |
| Codename | TU104B | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #174 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
