GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

2019Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1095 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021Core: 1800 MHzBoost: 1967 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Draws 80W instead of 400W, a 320W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

  • 29.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 400% higher power demand at 400W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 29.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (13,182 vs 12,766), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), a 7nm process instead of 12nm, 602 vs 46 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 368 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
G3D Mark Score
12,766
13,182+3%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2944
3840 ×2+30%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.447 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS ×2+134%
Boost Clock
1095 MHz
1967 MHz+80%
ROPs
64
96 ×2+50%
TMUs
184
240 ×2+30%
L1 Cache
2.9 MB+287%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
46
60 ×2+30%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
864 GB/s+125%
Bus Width
256-bit
384-bit+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Encoder
NVENC 6
VCN 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC 4
VCN 4.0 (2x)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
TDP
80W-80%
400W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
500W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
280mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
159.6+384%
33.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP
$3499
Codename
TU104B
Navi 21
Release
January 29 2019
August 3 2021
Ranking
#174
#157

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.