GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile vs Intel Arc Pro A60
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is positioned at rank 110 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 is on rank 60, so the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A60.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $380 for the Intel Arc Pro A60, it costs 61% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 153.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+153.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Intel Arc Pro A60
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1238 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,494 points.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile scores 9,494 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 reaches 9,493 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,494 | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2050 MHz+37% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile draws 60W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-54% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 158.2+117% | 73.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile costs 60.5% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile offers 153.2% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $380 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-61% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.3+153% | 25.0 |
| Codename | GN20-P0 | DG2-256 |
| Release | May 11 2021 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #286 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Intel Arc Pro A60
