GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
VS
RTX A2000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile vs RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

2021Core: 1238 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A2000 Mobile

2021Core: 1215 MHzBoost: 1687 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is positioned at rank 110 and the RTX A2000 Mobile is on rank 214, so the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#100
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
270%
#102
245%
#103
244%
#107
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
222%
#108
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
220%
#110
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
100%
#114
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP: $179|Avg: $40
97%
#116
GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
95%
#117
GeForce MX570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $120
95%
#118
Radeon RX 6500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
95%
#119
GeForce 825M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
#121
Radeon HD 6970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $48
94%
#123
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#125
GeForce GT 550M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Mobile

#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
90%
#204
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
434%
#206
393%
#207
392%
#211
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
357%
#212
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
354%
#214
RTX A2000 Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
97%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
94%
#222
93%
#224
GeForce GT 640M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
91%
#228
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX A2000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile.

InsightGeForce RTX 3050 4GB MobileRTX A2000 Mobile
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A2000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1238 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,494 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A2000 Mobile

The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile scores 9,494 and the RTX A2000 Mobile reaches 9,506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is built on Ampere while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1687 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 4GB MobileRTX A2000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
9,494
9,506
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
Process Node
8 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2048
2560+25%
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1687 MHz+12%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A2000 Mobile relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 4GB MobileRTX A2000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 4GB MobileRTX A2000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 4GB MobileRTX A2000 Mobile
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 4GB MobileRTX A2000 Mobile
Encoder
NVENC 8.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP11
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile draws 60W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 45.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 4GB MobileRTX A2000 Mobile
TDP
60W-37%
95W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
158.2+58%
100.1