GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU vs GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU and GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,240 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU scores 11,240 and the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design reaches 11,461 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1185 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) with 80 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,240 | 11,461+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+67% | 5.46 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+50% | 1185 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+9% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 36+80% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 288+260% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 384 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 80W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.5 | 143.3+66% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU and GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
