
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB vs GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3060 8GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $91 versus $280 for the GeForce RTX 3060 8GB, it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 215.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+215.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) | ✅More affordable ($91) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 8GB and GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,208 points.

GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB scores 15,208 and the GeForce GTX 1080 reaches 15,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1080 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,208 | 15,609+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+44% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+3% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 160+43% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+272% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1080 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 240 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) — the GeForce RTX 3060 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 240 GB/s | 320 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 1080's 180W — a 5.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1080). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-6% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.5+3% | 86.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce GTX 1080 launched at $599 and now averages $91. The GeForce GTX 1080 costs 67.5% less ($189 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.3 (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 171.5 (GeForce GTX 1080) — the GeForce GTX 1080 offers 215.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | GeForce GTX 1080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-45% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | $91-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.3 | 171.5+216% |
| Codename | GA106 | GP104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #147 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














