G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅16878.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 227710% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅6300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 128 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
❌46.7% longer card at 242mm vs 165mm.

GeForce4 MX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 165mm instead of 242mm, a 77mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16878.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 507700% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 227710% (50.9 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce4 MX 460

The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 4 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 507700%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce4 MX 460 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 336 (GeForce4 MX 460). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce4 MX 460
G3D Mark Score	20,312+507700%	4
Architecture	Ampere	Fermi
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	4864+1348%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+1686%	0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	152+171%	56
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+991%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 MX 460 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce4 MX 460
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 460 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 6300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce4 MX 460
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+6300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce4 MX 460
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)+71%	7.0
Vulkan	1.3	None
OpenGL	4.6+254%	1.3
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs No (GeForce4 MX 460). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs No.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce4 MX 460
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	No
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	No
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 160W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce4 MX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 460). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce4 MX 460
TDP	200W	160W-20%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	165mm
Height	112mm	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	60°C-20%
Perf/Watt	101.6	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the GeForce4 MX 460 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 460 was 55.1% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP	$399	$179-55%
Performance per Dollar	50.9	0.0
Codename	GA104	GF104
Release	December 1 2020	July 12 2010
Ranking	#73	#652

Search GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce4 MX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.