G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅188.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $26 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 210.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌20.4% longer card at 242mm vs 201mm.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 201mm instead of 242mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
6.5% HIGHER MSRP
$425 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

✅188.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $26 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 210.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 201mm instead of 242mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌20.4% longer card at 242mm vs 201mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
6.5% HIGHER MSRP
$425 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P2000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 188.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 6,964 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro P2000 is a 2017 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017, 191.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 5 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about $26 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $425 MSRP, and you are getting 188.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 191.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 210.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P2000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $425 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro P2000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
1080p
low	152 FPS	82 FPS
medium	137 FPS	70 FPS
high	118 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	39 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	72 FPS
medium	107 FPS	62 FPS
high	91 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	25 FPS
medium	65 FPS	24 FPS
high	50 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro P2000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
1080p
low	425 FPS	159 FPS
medium	366 FPS	127 FPS
high	296 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	109 FPS
medium	229 FPS	85 FPS
high	190 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	53 FPS
medium	114 FPS	42 FPS
high	96 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro P2000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
1080p
low	859 FPS	307 FPS
medium	693 FPS	251 FPS
high	602 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	230 FPS
medium	529 FPS	188 FPS
high	452 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	143 FPS
medium	346 FPS	125 FPS
high	275 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro P2000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
1080p
low	580 FPS	154 FPS
medium	514 FPS	125 FPS
high	424 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	110 FPS
medium	427 FPS	90 FPS
high	335 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	63 FPS
medium	266 FPS	49 FPS
high	234 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro P2000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P2000

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P2000's 6,964 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 191.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
G3D Mark Score	20,312+192%	6,964
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	4864+375%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+434%	3.031 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+13%	1480 MHz
ROPs	80+100%	40
TMUs	152+138%	64
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+1163%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+220%	1.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 has 5 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+60%	5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+220%	1.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P2000
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	201mm
Height	112mm	112mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	101.6+9%	92.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 6.1% less ($26 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 16.4 (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 210.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).